The Sport of the Future has an Interesting Past..
Welcome Text
Friday, September 03, 2010
Search
bg
arrow
MMA MEMORIES - The “Brand” or the “Star”
rss
The “Brand” or the “Star”
Published by on January 25th, 2008 in Operation Cleanup

Print Print | Email Email | RSS Feeds RSS

By Charles Jay

Because they must operate with the sanction and approval of athletic commissions, the UFC’s live gate figures are going to be part of the public record, since taxes and fees are assessed by the state agency based on those numbers. But pay-per-view figures, which are known to the cable operators, are not necessarily accessible to the public. Neither are the other income avenues, for this privately-held company.

That’s convenient. But sooner or later you just knew it was going to run into some resistance. Because sooner or later information leaks out. Because fighters can look into the crowd at a major arena or stadium and see a sellout. Because there are always going to be people who come along and, in the interest of maybe making a buck or two for themselves, will wise the fighter up. And just because they’re opportunists, that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re lying.

I wouldn’t disparage the UFC for wanting to build its brand above all else; in making it bigger than any individual fighter. After all, the way they see it they have their own interests to protect and this is how they maintain a healthy amount of leverage. This is how they mitigate the effects of the departure of any one so-called “star.” And to be brutally honest about it, the fighters have an abbreviated shelf life, while the brand can go on forever, right?

But if you are going to engage in the promotion of something that has the individual performer at its center, it is a cold, hard fact of life that those individuals are at some point going to be SEEN as individuals and not as mere spokes in a wheel. The UFC has, in a way, become a victim of its own mainstream popularity. The biggest stars; the most successful performers, are bound to become successful entities in their own right. They are going to have crossover appeal. They are going to become icons. And when that happens, they want to be PAID accordingly.

The argument the UFC, or anyone speaking on their behalf, would try to advance, is that they, the UFC, made these guys what they are today and they should be eternally grateful for it. In turn, because of that, they should be happy with the money they’re making and for the fact that they’re not working for $20 an hour somewhere as a karate instructor.

Well, that argument may start the car, but it doesn’t get too far down the highway.

You see, the entertainment business is driven by demand, whether it is demand for a product or for a commodity. Look at the acting business. Somebody who is waiting tables and flunking auditions today is going to be a star on television or in film a year from today. That’s the way it is, and it happens every day. Now do you think a studio is going to sit there and tell them they should accept lower wages than they’re worth just because they should feel fortunate to be in that position? Of course not. If you draw money, you command money. And when you don’t draw money anymore, you’re on the scrap heap. It’s that simple.

My prediction is that as this business continues to evolve and there are more MMA offerings available on pay-per-view and elsewhere, whether those offerings are ultimately successful or not, MMA is going to move from being product-driven to being star driven. That is the way the pay-per-view business has traditionally worked and that is what it will settle into for the MMA promoters. Boxing’s mega-events never sell to just the boxing fans; they have to transcend boxing to make it into the stratosphere. The same will hold true for MMA. That means crossover awareness is real currency. And for some of the performers there is simply too much crossover value for them not to be more in demand than others. At that point, if they can maintain relative free agency, they will be in the driver’s seat.

It would behoove the UFC to get out ahead of the curve.

Because the fastest way for them to lose the strength of their brand is to lose the brand names with some strength.

If you know what I mean.


Do you tweet? Follow us and get all the latest news on our twitter!

bg
arrow
MMA Biofiles
View our up to date, exclusive Biofiles for all of the biggest names in the Mixed Martial Arts...
bg
arrow
Share this page
img1
img1
img1
img1
img1
google
ask.com
img1
img1
img10
bg
arrow
MMA Poll
Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.
bg
arrow
Memorable Quotes
"The company's making money, everybody's making money. But it's about the fights. I don't care about the money. I don't even like talking about money. The fans show up, they get autographs with the fighters, they get stuff signed that they bring. The sport is very fan-friendly, approachable, and it's not about the money."- Dana White